If there wasn’t something good/enjoyable about it, they wouldn’t copy it.  That was my first thought when reading about the the Church that was “non-religious”.  I had a real mix of emotion and thought after reading about this “Church” and wasn’t sure what to take away from it.

So here are a few of the questions we’ll address this next week:

What makes a church a “church”?

What elements did “pretend church” borrow from traditional church that helped make it enjoyable for the people that went?

What can we learn from this “pretend church” ?

If you could change one thing about Sierra, what would it be?

It’s worth scrolling through the pictures at the top of the article to get a feel for what they did.

The article can be found here:


Truth from the Pretend Church

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.